Training points to be identified
Overall for a judge
A rewritable judge
A clean judge
A fearless judge
A knowledgable judge
A learned judge
A legal judge
A cool judge
A performing judge
an impartial judge
A consistant judge
A transparent judge
A wise judge
A consentious judge
A punctual judge
A well prepared judge
Not dependent on bar
Not dependent on office
A Driver judge
Not a driven judge
A controller judge
Not a controlled Judge
Where did the earlier judges fail
They were subjective
They showed apparent gender prejudices
They failed to take the constitution as their baseline
They differed drastically at the fall of every hat
They showed extremities
They lacked innovation
They allowed pre-independence notions to prevail.
They were untrained judges
They suffered from divine ego
They nurtured divine mine set
They communicated sans-recourse
They communicated egoistically
They were ill exposed
They were ill educated in law
They only thought of my case, my court and me, none shared or created a system vision or concern
They doubted every coming generation as if they were the zenith of human evolution.
They were really showy
They nurtured class bias and caste bias
They showed super ambitions
Only a few could remain really sober.
They practised opaque personality
They did very little research
THey decided cases and did not care for law
They did not develop standard bench marks
On the administrative side they failed to show fairness.
They proved bad planners
They proved slow administrators
The judges did not take the declarations of apex bodies really serious
Where the new generation judge has to improve
No more divine judge
No more instinctive judge
Standard trained judge
No male judge, nor female judge
No hindu judge nor muslim etc judge
Only constitutionalist judge
No convicting judge, nor liberal judge
only legal judge
More exact judge
lesser ego, more transparent
Really prompt judge
A 24X7 judge, investing his whole energy for his job
More knowledgeable judge
Benchmarks /footprints of the ealier generation
We had H R khanna and many more courageous judges
We had Bhopal District Judge Who gave the intrim order
We had judges at the ground level who earned appreciation of Apex Court
Judiciary guided,decided but never confronted
Judges acted as a vigilant guard
Whole judiciary acted together without fear
Indian Judiciary is one of the best performing judiciary
for civil side
How to read the plaint /WS and each application- art of
How to find out the doctored ,embroidered , evasive, oscillating pleadings
How to find out rub, point of difference.
Examining the parties-art of
getting truth in the court unofficially but legally
How to get the parties to agree to sort out the rub- art of
Comparing the pleadings, reading together
Judges must not be dependent on lawyers or office
For criminal side
To learn to appreciate on human probability
To see that stating the charg to the accused intellegently , completetly as per law is foremost duty of the court. Judges have been found negligent on this count.
To ensure that explaining all the adverse material against an accused must be put before the accused so that the materials can be explained by him. This duty has to be discharged religiously. Judges do fail on this count.
To allow all the relevant material to be brought on record.
To protect the Victim, witness and the evidence .
To ensure fair trial, only proportionate sentence.
To ensure adequate compensation to the victims, sufferers
To ensure fair and complete recording of evidence.
To take down the demeanour of the witnesses
To be active while witness is in dock and ensure that the witness is not gagged.
As legal service activist
As manager and administrator
With bar
With other stake older
as a judicial leader
as a constitutional army men
as a human being
Overall for a judge
A rewritable judge
A clean judge
A fearless judge
A knowledgable judge
A learned judge
A legal judge
A cool judge
A performing judge
an impartial judge
A consistant judge
A transparent judge
A wise judge
A consentious judge
A punctual judge
A well prepared judge
Not dependent on bar
Not dependent on office
A Driver judge
Not a driven judge
A controller judge
Not a controlled Judge
Where did the earlier judges fail
They were subjective
They showed apparent gender prejudices
They failed to take the constitution as their baseline
They differed drastically at the fall of every hat
They showed extremities
They lacked innovation
They allowed pre-independence notions to prevail.
They were untrained judges
They suffered from divine ego
They nurtured divine mine set
They communicated sans-recourse
They communicated egoistically
They were ill exposed
They were ill educated in law
They only thought of my case, my court and me, none shared or created a system vision or concern
They doubted every coming generation as if they were the zenith of human evolution.
They were really showy
They nurtured class bias and caste bias
They showed super ambitions
Only a few could remain really sober.
They practised opaque personality
They did very little research
THey decided cases and did not care for law
They did not develop standard bench marks
On the administrative side they failed to show fairness.
They proved bad planners
They proved slow administrators
The judges did not take the declarations of apex bodies really serious
Where the new generation judge has to improve
No more divine judge
No more instinctive judge
Standard trained judge
No male judge, nor female judge
No hindu judge nor muslim etc judge
Only constitutionalist judge
No convicting judge, nor liberal judge
only legal judge
More exact judge
lesser ego, more transparent
Really prompt judge
A 24X7 judge, investing his whole energy for his job
More knowledgeable judge
Benchmarks /footprints of the ealier generation
We had H R khanna and many more courageous judges
We had Bhopal District Judge Who gave the intrim order
We had judges at the ground level who earned appreciation of Apex Court
Judiciary guided,decided but never confronted
Judges acted as a vigilant guard
Whole judiciary acted together without fear
Indian Judiciary is one of the best performing judiciary
for civil side
How to read the plaint /WS and each application- art of
How to find out the doctored ,embroidered , evasive, oscillating pleadings
How to find out rub, point of difference.
Examining the parties-art of
getting truth in the court unofficially but legally
How to get the parties to agree to sort out the rub- art of
Comparing the pleadings, reading together
Judges must not be dependent on lawyers or office
For criminal side
To learn to appreciate on human probability
To see that stating the charg to the accused intellegently , completetly as per law is foremost duty of the court. Judges have been found negligent on this count.
To ensure that explaining all the adverse material against an accused must be put before the accused so that the materials can be explained by him. This duty has to be discharged religiously. Judges do fail on this count.
To allow all the relevant material to be brought on record.
To protect the Victim, witness and the evidence .
To ensure fair trial, only proportionate sentence.
To ensure adequate compensation to the victims, sufferers
To ensure fair and complete recording of evidence.
To take down the demeanour of the witnesses
To be active while witness is in dock and ensure that the witness is not gagged.
As legal service activist
As manager and administrator
With bar
With other stake older
as a judicial leader
as a constitutional army men
as a human being
No comments:
Post a Comment