Justice is the social aspiration since living beings formed groups. We have been talking about justice since time immemorial without even a standard vision for justice. We don't have any definite concrete idea of justice that can be shared by all. The prevalent idea of justice is either personal or State-based. Everybody has his own definition of justice which suits him and him alone. Generally speaking I, U and HE all talked about justice for me, mine justice and nothing else.
It has rarely been defined. Kings abstain from defining justice, laws don't have a definition for it. Philosophers are really divided, and philosophy is horribly liquid. Contradicting individual frames innumerable time frames and geographical, climatic, demographic, biological cut throat diversities and human psychology that is basically ego based make it further difficult to spell out the concept of justice with real clarity.
Talking of Judges. They claim to be fountain of justice that too for society and others but, quite often make castles in the air everyday, destroy it themselves claiming it ugly and create a ghost again labeling it justice only to be disowned the other day. Constitutions after constitutions are adopted but with the change of political philosophy these are changed like kings dress. You can see patches of justice which are used to decorate it Kingly dresses. Any cracy- demo, aristo, bearueau- all avow in the name of justice poles apart from justice.
Justice for hungry- perhaps a bread. Justice for an old- perhaps a stick. Justice for child- perhaps his mother. But, these all change very rapidly. Perhaps law of diminishing utility applies to justice.
What upholds the society is justice and the time for which the society is held right is the life of justice. Proportionate social reaction to absolute personal expectations is justice.
Justice is never a law alone. Justice is the destination for law. Law is only a tool not justice in itself. Sometimes law is the cause of injustice. at times there may be justice without law. Law is not the source of justice. Law may be KINGS' whim for JUSTICE not the social prudence for justice.
Justice is very close to the word -JUST- still closer to word stick. I combine these two. Justice is just stick (STAND RIGHT). Everybody everything to stand right to its own space. Perhaps that is the concept of justice.
Objective understanding of what is right stand is justice. The more this understanding is subjective, the more justice is slapped on the face.
Generally speaking, Justice is often haunted by individual subjective approach. Even the society which is quite often really fragmented has subjective parameters. each has its own vices. Prejudices loom large. Interests have to be served at any cost. If this is the scenario where will you get asylum for justice. And the last, I will stick for or defend myself tooth and nail. In this situation Justice is the first casualty. Justice asks for tolerance. It is one of the foremost. ingredient. Rational ratio and proportion is another ingredient of Justice . Equality of opportunities and deliveries are prerequisites for justice .
It has rarely been defined. Kings abstain from defining justice, laws don't have a definition for it. Philosophers are really divided, and philosophy is horribly liquid. Contradicting individual frames innumerable time frames and geographical, climatic, demographic, biological cut throat diversities and human psychology that is basically ego based make it further difficult to spell out the concept of justice with real clarity.
Talking of Judges. They claim to be fountain of justice that too for society and others but, quite often make castles in the air everyday, destroy it themselves claiming it ugly and create a ghost again labeling it justice only to be disowned the other day. Constitutions after constitutions are adopted but with the change of political philosophy these are changed like kings dress. You can see patches of justice which are used to decorate it Kingly dresses. Any cracy- demo, aristo, bearueau- all avow in the name of justice poles apart from justice.
Justice for hungry- perhaps a bread. Justice for an old- perhaps a stick. Justice for child- perhaps his mother. But, these all change very rapidly. Perhaps law of diminishing utility applies to justice.
What upholds the society is justice and the time for which the society is held right is the life of justice. Proportionate social reaction to absolute personal expectations is justice.
Justice is never a law alone. Justice is the destination for law. Law is only a tool not justice in itself. Sometimes law is the cause of injustice. at times there may be justice without law. Law is not the source of justice. Law may be KINGS' whim for JUSTICE not the social prudence for justice.
Justice is very close to the word -JUST- still closer to word stick. I combine these two. Justice is just stick (STAND RIGHT). Everybody everything to stand right to its own space. Perhaps that is the concept of justice.
Objective understanding of what is right stand is justice. The more this understanding is subjective, the more justice is slapped on the face.
Generally speaking, Justice is often haunted by individual subjective approach. Even the society which is quite often really fragmented has subjective parameters. each has its own vices. Prejudices loom large. Interests have to be served at any cost. If this is the scenario where will you get asylum for justice. And the last, I will stick for or defend myself tooth and nail. In this situation Justice is the first casualty. Justice asks for tolerance. It is one of the foremost. ingredient. Rational ratio and proportion is another ingredient of Justice . Equality of opportunities and deliveries are prerequisites for justice .
No comments:
Post a Comment