Judiciary must not lead nor judges should be leaders. Leaders must not be judges.
Judiciary must not be reactive nor reavtives should be manning judiciary.
Judges must not be experimentalist. Judiciary must not experiment. That is not the area of operation of the judicial system.
Judiciary may examine , decide experiments being made by different components of society but the judiciary itself must not engage in the act of organising the construction activities or the experimenting activities of the society. Judges may watch, witness, comment and if they have the occasion may decide the things that is or was or that should have been but judges must not dictate the future course of the society.
Radicals must not be judges in any society. Too innovative a judge may not be a welcome idea. Too brave of courageous judiciary is not in the interest of a stable society. Social order develops only when there is consistency or continued stability. If the judiciary starts interrupting or dictating the social road map we will have a mechanism wholly controlled and directed by judiciary. If this is allowed, it may be disastrous because judges are revered for their judicial aloofness and fairness that starts with impartiality and ends with it. But a leader judiciary or an ambitious judiciary cannot remain unattached. An attached judiciary may have an agenda. A judiciary having its own agenda other than law or justice will be a extension of political frame of political mind. Politics may be anything but never justice. political thoughts are case sensitive, geography sensitive, individual sensitive, history or knowledge sensitive whereas justice is
perpetual in shape size in essence.
Justice is journey towards righteousness where as politics is journey to-wards a predetermined agenda, destination. The ends for justice are fairness and that is the means of justice.
In politics everytinh everytime must not be fair rather experience shows that political pathways are never made of only fair material. Kings do take routes that may not be pure or fair
But then, justice is not kingly, it is like king's soul not king's mind. King's hans never reflect king's soul. King's soul only speaks through judges.
Judges may not always be right or wise but judges try to be and are always fair and if a judge is not fair he need not be there as a judge.
A judge is known for his fairness and sobriety. Valour is not judge like virtue but timidity has no place in judiciary. A judge must be firm and clear in his objective.
No favour and no fear, correct and fair standards, fair examination and fair conclusions- that is judiciary. Let me speak out my mind to you without fear and if you trust you can find out where you stand after a wise standard examination- is a judgement by a judge.
A judge spoke once but his judgement keep on speaking al the time.
A judge lives through his judgements and enjoys through those judgements.
Kings change and with them changes the kingdom, kingship and loyalty but loyalty of a judge remains even after the judgement.
.
Judiciary must not be reactive nor reavtives should be manning judiciary.
Judges must not be experimentalist. Judiciary must not experiment. That is not the area of operation of the judicial system.
Judiciary may examine , decide experiments being made by different components of society but the judiciary itself must not engage in the act of organising the construction activities or the experimenting activities of the society. Judges may watch, witness, comment and if they have the occasion may decide the things that is or was or that should have been but judges must not dictate the future course of the society.
Radicals must not be judges in any society. Too innovative a judge may not be a welcome idea. Too brave of courageous judiciary is not in the interest of a stable society. Social order develops only when there is consistency or continued stability. If the judiciary starts interrupting or dictating the social road map we will have a mechanism wholly controlled and directed by judiciary. If this is allowed, it may be disastrous because judges are revered for their judicial aloofness and fairness that starts with impartiality and ends with it. But a leader judiciary or an ambitious judiciary cannot remain unattached. An attached judiciary may have an agenda. A judiciary having its own agenda other than law or justice will be a extension of political frame of political mind. Politics may be anything but never justice. political thoughts are case sensitive, geography sensitive, individual sensitive, history or knowledge sensitive whereas justice is
perpetual in shape size in essence.
Justice is journey towards righteousness where as politics is journey to-wards a predetermined agenda, destination. The ends for justice are fairness and that is the means of justice.
In politics everytinh everytime must not be fair rather experience shows that political pathways are never made of only fair material. Kings do take routes that may not be pure or fair
But then, justice is not kingly, it is like king's soul not king's mind. King's hans never reflect king's soul. King's soul only speaks through judges.
Judges may not always be right or wise but judges try to be and are always fair and if a judge is not fair he need not be there as a judge.
A judge is known for his fairness and sobriety. Valour is not judge like virtue but timidity has no place in judiciary. A judge must be firm and clear in his objective.
No favour and no fear, correct and fair standards, fair examination and fair conclusions- that is judiciary. Let me speak out my mind to you without fear and if you trust you can find out where you stand after a wise standard examination- is a judgement by a judge.
A judge spoke once but his judgement keep on speaking al the time.
A judge lives through his judgements and enjoys through those judgements.
Kings change and with them changes the kingdom, kingship and loyalty but loyalty of a judge remains even after the judgement.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment