The intolerance of the executive and some times of the legislature towards the judiciary's claims to independence throws up many risks which affect the working of the subordinate judiciary.                                                                            These wings often do not co-operate with the subordinate judiciary up to their fullest.
The judge's skills are very much on demand to tactfully and effectively manage such risks.   
Te conflict rarely comes out in open. it is ther as an under current adding to the tension under which a judge has to work.
In most cases open conflict is avoided. The judge's anxiety to avert a conflict  results in neglect of their bare needs  and even necessities. However this scenario is not  healthy and posses further risks so far the area of risk management in judicial management is concerned.
Judges cannot reach to political ears of the executive. Judges never speak out their grievances publicly. Subordinate Judiciary being closest to public and further closest to the ultimate execution of every judicial order  are really exposed to disguised threats. For this limb of judiciary the only hope is High Court but most of the times  the ears of High Courts are found beyond their reach.
The plight of civil judges  subordinate to high court  calls for urgent attention. If not attended  at the right moment, it may pose a grave risk to their efficiency very soon.
If I use a direct phrase  to convey  myself-it runs the risk of insubordination-when addressed to the High Court.If the demand is addressed to are loud,they run the risk of political overtones.