VALEDICTORY ADDRESS DELIVERED BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B.
SINHA, JUDGE, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ON 25.7.2003 TO NEWLY APPOINTED OFFICERS OF DELHI
JUDICIAL SERVICE
I am grateful to the Delhi Judicial Academy for giving me this
opportunity to be amidst you this evening.
First of all, let me
congratulate the new recruits to the Delhi Judicial Service who are completing
their training today. It is the third
batch of trainees. My sentimental attachment
would remain with these young Judges who are to take up the reigns of judicial
system from the next working day as they are the ones with whom I as a member
of the Interview Committee had the opportunity to interact during interview.
For the same reason my expectations from you are also very high.
Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, 1948 declares that the Rule of Law should protect human rights so
that men avoid resorting to rebellion against tyranny and oppression. Rule of
Law also includes the principle that every citizen should have a guarantee of
effectively defending himself and his fundamental rights.
Recently, there had been an
interesting discussion as to why foreign investment in China is much more than
in India. The reasons assigned are commitment of the work force, cheap labour,
labour laws besides discipline amongst the working forces. On a comparison of the infrastructural
availability of raw-materials, labour force, bureaurcratic set up, existing
laws and other relevant considerations etc., India was found to be a favoured
destination for investors only on two counts: (i) India is a country governed
by the Rule of Law and (ii) It has an independent and impartial judiciary.
Survival of democracy,
therefore, is dependent not only upon existence of the Rule of Law but also a
strong and independent judiciary, which can see to it that the Rule of Law is
enforced.
For the continued existence
and sustenance of a truly democratic State, the administration of justice
should be in the hands of not only competent but also impartial, independent
and conscientious persons so that justice is rendered and Rule of Law is
upheld, which are imperative for a free society.
Under the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 which is an optional protocol to
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, every country shall have to ensure
that a citizen shall have an effective remedy for enforcing his rights or
freedoms. This is not a new concept. Since the ages, Civilization has
recognized the right of every person to seek redressal in a judicial Tribunal.
The legal maxim ubi jus ibi remedium is not an empty promise.
Justice is the very basic
constitutional concept.
For resolution of disputes
between parties, the involvement of a third party forum has been found
imperative. The jurisprudence that we have inherited from the British has
inbuilt safeguards in it in so far as the disputants are entitled to be
represented through their lawyers who would practice their right best.
Getting through successfully
into the judicial service, that too Delhi Judicial Service, is the aspiration
of thousands of young advocates not only of this city but other parts of
country as persons from all over sit in the examination. It cannot be denied
that you belong to a prestigious service. How many persons are able to make
into this service? There is no other service where one is truly independent and
where their conduct can only be judged by their peers. I know how much
industry, patience and stern discipline and how many hours of self-denying
toil, are represented by you young men and women who have been able to make it
to this service. Those successful
entrants form the creamy layer of the judiciary. My sincere wish is-May God
grant you the fulfillment of your maturer years and as you make advancements in
your career.
All of you had your basic
routine education in schoo1 and professional education in law college. All of
you have spent some years at the bar also before taking up the judicial service
examination. However, for discharge of your duties as judicial officers, how
important is the professional training, you must have realised this in this
Academy during last four to five months.
However, what I would like
to emphasis is that learning is a continuous process and it cannot be more true
in the case of legal education. Therefore, you should not feel that your
training is over and nothing more is to be learnt by you. In fact as you will
experience while discharging your judicial duties, you are learning every day
in the court even as a Judge. Take this training in this sense of real
education which is going to be of your benefit in the entire career which is
ahead of you. Give "education" its real and substantial meaning. Mr.
Palkiwala in one of his addresses said that Education has been called the technique
of transmitting civilisation. In order that it may transmit civilisation, it
has to perform two major functions: it must enlighten the understanding, and it
must enrich the character.
The two marks of a truly
educated man whose understanding has been enlightened, are the capacity to
think clearly and intellectual curiosity. If you have imbibed the ability to
think clearly, you will adopt an attitude of reserve towards ideologies that
are popular and be critical of the nostrums that are fashionable you will find
the truth. Intel1ectual curiosity would enable you to continue and intensify
the process of learning even after you have finished your training. This
curiosity shall keep you student for life. Once Tej Bahadur Sapra had said,
"there is no presumption that judges know but there is every presumption
that lawyers know law". However, some jurists are of the opinion that the
judges and lawyers alike are students of law.
Second function of
education, as I told you, is enriching the character. What we need today more
than anything else is moral leadership-founded on courage, intellectual
integrity and a sense of values. If you have been able to build this character
during the course of your training only then I shall consider that this Academy
has fulfilled its objective of imparting you the necessary training. You, as
members of Delhi Judicial Service, are one of the important wings of
administration. In the course of your
duties you would be discharging essential sovereign function of dispensing
justice.
We have given ourselves a beautiful
Constitution with high moral tone. However, it is widely accepted that it is
not the letters of the Constitution but the people who manage the same, make it
successful. India has been a great country with one of the greatest and oldest
civilisation to boast about.
However, that is what India
was once upon a time. We cannot, with equal authority, claim this to be
present-day India.
The adversarial system,
which is one of the great 1egacies of the British ru1e in India, has worked
reasonably well for centuries. However,
in view the docket explosion the faith and confidence in the Judiciary has
undergone substantial erosion. The functioning of the system is also being
questioned in different quarters having regard to the procedural wrangles,
enormous costs and inordinate delay involved in it.
Justice delivery system in
India is bursting at the seams and may collapse unless immediate remedial
measures are adopted not only by the judiciary but also by the legislature and
the executive.
Different wings of the State
are plagued with corruption, nepotism, red tappism. There is hardly any law and
order in this society. There are problems of poverty, hunger, mal-nutrition,
food adulteration. Even after more than 50 years of independence we have not
been able to provide drinking water to the people of this country. Criminals
are ruling the roost with large scale crimes, including murders, decoities and
white-col1ar crimes which have assumed frightening and varied proportions. Women
are not safe. There are frequent incidents of rape, molestation, sexual
harassment at workplaces, cases of bride burning and dowry deaths.
Courts were seen as a last
resort by the commoners of this country with a hope that it would remove these
ills with which society is suffering. However, today even judiciary is at cross
roads and it is a matter of concern to all of us. People had lost faith in
other two wings of the State much earlier. Faith of common man in judiciary is
also being eroded.
Article 14 of the
Constitution of India speaks of reasonableness. Is it too much for a litigant
having regard to the doctrine of reasonableness to look forward to an honest
judgment within a reasonable time, inasmuch as the said doctrine encompasses
within its fold that all actions must be taken within a reasonable time? Would
it also be too much to ask the legal fraternity to render all cooperations so
as that court are in a position to perform their duties?
People indisputably have
been trying to avoid law Courts. Sometimes they are forced to do so as is the
case in some of the districts of the State of Jharkhand, State of Bihar, and
State of Andhra Pradesh etc. where people are forced to take their disputes
only to the Courts run by the extremists. It is said that justice is instantly
delivered there but in a very crude form. Apart from the fact that severe
punishments are meted out even for minor offences; innocents are also punished
so severely that the same runs contrary to all canons of a civilized society. Extra constitutional Courts, thus, have also
started functioning.
Should we, being a part of
the society, allow this to happen? When for avenging a murder another murder
takes place; when a landlord instead of approaching the Court of law hires the
services of goons or where the services of the criminals are hired for settling
all types of disputes; can we say that we are living in a civilized society
governed by the Rule of Law? Answer to this question must be rendered in the
negative.
Our Criminal justice
delivery system also bears a big question mark. Only 30 to 35 per cent of the
existing criminal cases end in conviction. 90 to 95 per cent of the matters
involving heinous offences end in acquittal. In contrast when the rate of
conviction in Japan in 1997 came down from 99 per cent to 96 per cent, a
Commission of Inquiry was set up for the purpose of finding out as to whether
more false cases are being registered.
Take another instance when
our criminal justice delivery system came up for severe criticism. Nadeem was
sought to be extradited to India in connection with the murder of Shri Gulshan
Kumar but the Courts in England turned down the prayer, inter alia, on the
ground of a poor justice delivery system in India.
For the shortcomings of the
investigating agencies or the witnesses turning hostile, the judiciary is being
blamed. Our criminal justice delivery system is constantly under attack from
all quarters. A picture that the entire system has collapsed is being painted.
We have to overcome all this. Task is gigantic. It may even appear to be very
difficult. However, there should not be pessimism. There is always a ray of
hope with new generation coming and taking up the challenge. You belong to that
generation. Be idealistic and take courage to even fight the system where it is
going to be wrong.
During this period of your
training you must have been stuffed with the sermons on the moral values; what
should be the qualities of a good Judge, how a judicial officer should conduct
himself inside and outside the Court, culture of a Judge, do's and don'ts to be
practiced by a Judge et al. Therefore, I am not going to give you any such
sermon today. Wherever, in the discharge of your duties you are able to redress
a wrong, you should not hesitate in de-throwning that wrong. You should be a
person with high moral fibre. Character, commitment and capacity should be your
hallmark. Simplicity and clarity should be your virtues. You have to achieve
excellence in the administration of your duties. You have to restore the faith
of people in the system.
There should be adherence to
law. When you work according to law and not according to the whims or the
dictates of others, your decision shall be flawless and would be ultimately
appreciated. Therefore, you should administer your office with due regard to
the integrity of system of law remembering that you are not a depository of
arbitrary power but an administrator under the sanction of law.
All this can be achieved if
you pledge today that you shall endeavour to become the enlightened citizen of
this country. Most of the ills with which society is suffering can be cured if
people of this country have character and Judges of this country have to be the
first ones to strive for it. Imbibe citizenship values and practice them.
We require a new vision accompanied by a
concrete strategy to accomplish it. The
whole emphasis is to develop a legal system, which does not stop at declaring
rights but backs it up with concrete steps to enforce them.
The necessity of training
the Judges and Judicial Officers also need not be over-emphasised. Such
training is required for developing the skills and personality of a Judge. It
is required so that he may apprise himself of his functions and duties and the
judicial approach and conduct expected of him.
We are now in the new
economy, which includes Information Technology, Entertainment and
Communications. The face of the corporate sector is completely changed as the
Old Economy giving way to the New Economy with a rapid economic change. In this
environment and atmosphere, law cannot remain static and it has to cope up with
the fast changes especially on economic matters due to liberalization.
The interpretation of law
depends upon the need in the society. We must take notice of the changes in it.
What at one point of time might be possible may not be possible in a changed
situation. New areas of law are emerging, for example, intellectual property
rights, information technology, cyber crime, international law, new
interpretative canons and in particular interpretation with reference to the
intentional treaties, declarations and conventions, anti trust law, competition
law, commercial arbitration, alternative disputes resolution mechanism, new
arenas of fundamental rights, human rights, environment and convergence etc.
Tomorrow, new technologies are going to develop. E-Courts at Mysore have
started functioning. Other Courts would
follow sore. E-filing in Supreme Court
and in some other High Courts is not a distant dream. Video-conferencing to
examine witnesses has now received the approval of the Supreme Court in The
State of Maharashtra Vs. Dr. Praful B. Desai, JT 2003 (3) SC 382.
If you imbibe the qualities
and discharge your duties with sincerity and devotion we can hope to restore
the credibility into the system. And if every person discharges his duties
sincerely we can again put our great nation on the same pedestal as it was.
Some of us thought of
bringing the Delhi Judicial Academy into existence and cherished the dream that
it becomes one of the best judicial academy in the country. I have no doubt
that Hon'ble the Chief Justice and Hon'ble Judges of the Delhi High Court as
also the Director and other officers of the Academy would make every endeavour
to see that this dream comes true.
No comments:
Post a Comment