Thursday, 3 April 2014
Intellectual Property Management Authority Of India- a step to be taken
Why a society like us "'We The People " of India cannot manage the intellectual Property of our own people or whether our 120+ crores minds do not work at all or worked rarely in the last two centuries or so. Why we are having such a poor inventory of Intellectual property at our command. Intellectual property or call inventions are not always product of very huge investment of resources or time. At times it has come accidently, through intuitions, through mistakes or through only a bit applied presence of mind, small imaginative thinking,petty experimental entrepreneurship.
Intellectual property though present but not identified or not taken into inventory is lost property.
We do not recognise our IP or we fail to locate it .We have failed to secure our IP. We either intentionally or inadvertently do that. Otherwise either we have not been trained on those counts or we have not been sensitised enough.
Any nation who fails to safeguard its wealth, cannot survive . Every sovereign state has a duty to protect its geographical boundaries, National wealth- both corporeal as well incorporeal. The foremost wealth and resource of a state is its subjects- human resource. A state is duty bound to invest vigorously in the development and upliftment of its human resources. Intellectual property is the product of mental exercise, thinking process, imagination, intuition, experiments by men.
Every state has to keep a watch over the national wealth and must ensure its safety. A systematic upkeeping of national worth is must I sincerely call upon the national think tank of India to moot, propose, explore the establishment of "Intellectual Property Management Authority Of India." with the following objectives-
a) TO create a ground -base data bank of all Intellectual Property like objects, propositions, innovations, ideas whether still finally established or still unrecognized or not. This should be spread up to Gram Panchayat Level and can be manned at village level by IP Identifier Volunteer Force.
b) To establish Technical Laboratories in order to cater to the needs of small IP Entrepreneur and to assist the other IP activists
c)To establish Legal Laboratories as well service centers to help small IP Entrepreneur and to assist the other IP activists
d) To establish a Legal Action front equipped with world class IP law knowledge with very sound Technocrat professional Force to assist Indian small IP Entrepreneur and to assist the other IP activists in courts
e) To establish an IP management fund structure to be utilised exclusively for creating, managing, docketing, locating IP worth of India.establishing IP base clinics at village level, IP referral Centers at District Level and state level IP management Center and Central IP management center, data Bank and utility Center- Authority. To build infrastructure for IP Procedure Code and developing the norms for the same .
f) To establish an IP Litigation and Protection Fund to be utilised to create awareness about IP, IP-laws,IP Concept, IP protection and confidentiality,Ip transaction, , IP legal procedure, IP Education, Inclusion of IP importance in school curriculum, for supplementing and raising effective court-resource persons as well for raising IP Volunteers Force, equipping Indian Law campuses
and Technical Institutions with IP knowledge infrastructure. And to create an independent IP PROTECTION BODY and to carry IP procedure code.
g)To raise an Indian Data Bank exclusively for IP purpose.
Why a society like us "'We The People " of India cannot manage the intellectual Property of our own people or whether our 120+ crores minds do not work at all or worked rarely in the last two centuries or so. Why we are having such a poor inventory of Intellectual property at our command. Intellectual property or call inventions are not always product of very huge investment of resources or time. At times it has come accidently, through intuitions, through mistakes or through only a bit applied presence of mind, small imaginative thinking,petty experimental entrepreneurship.
Intellectual property though present but not identified or not taken into inventory is lost property.
We do not recognise our IP or we fail to locate it .We have failed to secure our IP. We either intentionally or inadvertently do that. Otherwise either we have not been trained on those counts or we have not been sensitised enough.
Any nation who fails to safeguard its wealth, cannot survive . Every sovereign state has a duty to protect its geographical boundaries, National wealth- both corporeal as well incorporeal. The foremost wealth and resource of a state is its subjects- human resource. A state is duty bound to invest vigorously in the development and upliftment of its human resources. Intellectual property is the product of mental exercise, thinking process, imagination, intuition, experiments by men.
Every state has to keep a watch over the national wealth and must ensure its safety. A systematic upkeeping of national worth is must I sincerely call upon the national think tank of India to moot, propose, explore the establishment of "Intellectual Property Management Authority Of India." with the following objectives-
a) TO create a ground -base data bank of all Intellectual Property like objects, propositions, innovations, ideas whether still finally established or still unrecognized or not. This should be spread up to Gram Panchayat Level and can be manned at village level by IP Identifier Volunteer Force.
b) To establish Technical Laboratories in order to cater to the needs of small IP Entrepreneur and to assist the other IP activists
c)To establish Legal Laboratories as well service centers to help small IP Entrepreneur and to assist the other IP activists
d) To establish a Legal Action front equipped with world class IP law knowledge with very sound Technocrat professional Force to assist Indian small IP Entrepreneur and to assist the other IP activists in courts
e) To establish an IP management fund structure to be utilised exclusively for creating, managing, docketing, locating IP worth of India.establishing IP base clinics at village level, IP referral Centers at District Level and state level IP management Center and Central IP management center, data Bank and utility Center- Authority. To build infrastructure for IP Procedure Code and developing the norms for the same .
f) To establish an IP Litigation and Protection Fund to be utilised to create awareness about IP, IP-laws,IP Concept, IP protection and confidentiality,Ip transaction, , IP legal procedure, IP Education, Inclusion of IP importance in school curriculum, for supplementing and raising effective court-resource persons as well for raising IP Volunteers Force, equipping Indian Law campuses
and Technical Institutions with IP knowledge infrastructure. And to create an independent IP PROTECTION BODY and to carry IP procedure code.
g)To raise an Indian Data Bank exclusively for IP purpose.
Do not compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
Do not compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
Do not compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
Do not compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
The law governing Intellectual Property world wide is not only inadequate rather does not recognise Intellectual Property per se but only emphasises research undertaken by MNC. It wilfully overlook individual tiny intellectual property or micro-intellectual property so that the real owners of these ideal-true IP may surrender their worth to IP Biggies .
The IP law today compartmentalise the IP intellectuals as IP BIGGIES and IP PIGGIES.
Most of the time IP PIGGIES do not know the worth of their wisdom, creation and utility and innovation or novelty that they create or do possess, due to their geographical or social or financial or cultural disadvantages. They have not been even made conscious that their novelty itself carries additional commercial, economic, legal value.
The IP concept has not been carried to the grass root IP breeding-places. I think, it is grossly incorrect that IP can be possessed only by educated or by wealthy or by corporate houses or by MNC.
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
A judge punishes not because he can but because he must. A judge refuses relief not because his conscience commands him to do so but because law does not permit a particular relief in a particular circumstance . If law permits relief in a particular circumstance , it is none of the business of a judge to deny the relief only because the conscience of the particular judge fails to respond to the law and law that is judge administered justice is justice alone. Let not subjectivity of a judge be taken as Justice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)